Clifford T. Araki, PhD RVT RVS
Associate Professor, Department of Medical Imaging Sciences
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
School of Health Related Professions
Newark, NY
What
is your current title and employer?
I am an Associate Professor in the Department of Medical Imaging Sciences
at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in the School
of Health Related Professions, and I serve as the Director of the Vascular
Technology Program. Our program has been in existence since 1995 and
we graduate 10–12 students each year.
What degrees and credentials do you have?
I earned my Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Hawaii and my
RVT in 1991. In 2007, I also credentialed myself as an RVS, principally
to seek that out as a substitute credential for our students. I think
it’s become a credible alternative to the RVT. It could be especially
important with the CARE bill looming on the horizon.
How long have you been in the vascular technology profession?
I have been in the vascular technology profession since 1985.
What made you decide to enter vascular technology as a career?
I made the transition through the Veterans Administration system, hired
as a clinical physiologist at the East Orange Veterans Administration
in New Jersey, where I had research and clinical responsibilities. I
was expected to learn the technical aspects of the vascular lab there
and I really came to enjoy working with patients. That was my first
exposure to patient care and the use of high tech clinical equipment.
In 1985, that was the Biosound club and Medasonics VascLab, which now
doesn’t seem so high tech.
I found out I really enjoyed working with patients, especially the
VA patient. They are a unique group. I moved on to the Boston University
Medical Center in 1986 with the same mix of research and clinical responsibilities.
It was there that I decided to move full-time into the vascular lab.
I moved back to New Jersey in the early 1990s and to UMDNJ to the University
Hospital Vascular Lab. Most of my experience has been in the inner city
type of hospital setting. I have managed a number of laboratories. I
think the inner city setting is most rewarding because of the patients.
They can be so very appreciative. I’ve got many good memories.
My mentor through the entire process was Dr. Robert W. Hobson. I spent
my life in the vascular arena chasing him around from New Jersey, to
Boston, then back to New Jersey. Dr. Hobson recently passed away. For
me it was a big loss. He stands alone as the single most influential
person in my professional life. I will always be grateful for his push
and his guidance.
What do you like best about your current position?
I’ve been involved in both the vascular lab and teaching for
quite awhile, but now I teach full-time. Teaching has its own rewards.
I receive my best joy from my current position by knowing that my efforts
have radically affected the lives of many students. I’ve talked
to a number of educators and most if not all mention a similar satisfaction.
Most of our students are adult learners ranging from 24 to 55 years
of age. Many had earned bachelor’s degrees. Others were in limbo
with an incomplete college education. Many of the people in our field
are second career adults who were at one time searching for a dramatic
change in lifestyle. Our students fit that mold. They may be driven
by better pay, but in almost all cases, they want something that will
give their lives more meaning.
I feel blessed because I give our students access to a field that is
truly unique in healthcare: working with patients in need of care, using
state of the art equipment that continually improves their own analytical
skills, and being directly in the loop of diagnosis and therapy. Technologists
in other clinical fields don’t gain this type of satisfaction.
Once, the director of another vascular program in Washington State
told me of a graduate who came back to him for a visit just to thank
him for changing his life and giving him opportunities he never would
think possible. Each year, I have similar experiences with our own graduates.
In December, we had a graduation dinner for our students. Many already
have jobs and the others are eagerly looking. It’s hard to not
be overwhelmed by the feeling of appreciation I receive and I believe
it’s only because our field offers great opportunities for entry-level
workers.
When did you join SVU?
I joined SVU, then SVT, in 1988.
What motivated you to run for the Board of Directors? (NOTE: Cliff
was elected in June 2007 to a three–year term on the SVU Board
of Directors: 2008-2010)
Education! The SVU directs its educational emphasis toward continuing
education for its members. It is taking more of an interest in entry
level academic education and scholarships and memberships for students,
but I think that academicians are a lost voice in the organization.
The society should seek more ways of bringing educators into the fold.
What do you hope to accomplish while being on the SVU Board of Directors?
I hope that I can increase the participation of educators in the SVU
annual conference. I would also like to see if the Board could have
the annual meeting more participatory, include the membership more directly
in steering the profession into the future.
What do you feel are the biggest issues facing the vascular profession
today?
We have the perpetual problem of being a small profession sandwiched
between two heavyweights - cardiology and general ultrasound. The challenges
this brings need to be addressed proactively. It’s a difficult
position to be in and the Board needs input from many sources to determine
how to step through the minefield.
From an educational perspective, the CARE bill will add complexities
when it passes. Where will we get the educated, registered, entry level
vascular techs that will be needed to fill the open laboratory positions?
The current number of training programs is way too few and unevenly
scattered.
What tips would you give to today’s ultrasound students about
their career in the vascular ultrasound profession?
Listen to your instructors!!! Students approach their clinicals with
the attitude of a student – to observe, study, and practice. The
laboratories are looking at the students in terms of their potential
as workers. We tell our students that they are not in the clinical lab
to observe and practice. They are there to learn what it takes to be
a good technologist. Some don’t see what we see - how their actions
in the lab will hurt them when they look for work or start working.
The hardest part of teaching is molding the attitude of students.
How can SVU better serve its members in the future?
The SVU should open up the process more to its members and be more
aggressive in developing protocol techniques among its membership for
what it sees on the horizon. The SVS push for entry into catheter-based
intervention is an example to emulate for pushing vascular technologists
into a larger, expanding realm.
Name of wife and any children and their ages? Any pets, and their
names?
I have a wife, Linda, and two grown children, Chad and Kellie, one
in California and the other in Hawaii with two grandkids.
What do you do for fun and relaxation when not working?
I dabble a little in learning how to play Hawaiian slack key guitar. |