2007 Physician Fee Schedule Rates and Policies2007 Physician Fee Schedule Analysisby SVU's regulatory/legislative advocacy firm, Sidley Austin LLP |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CMS released its final physician fee schedule ("PFS") and hospital outpatient department ("HOPD") rules for 2007 last week. The rules implement the imaging cuts found in the Deficit Reduction Act, but the PFS final rule ("PFS rule") excludes several ultrasound codes not initially excluded in the PFS proposed rule. The two rules implement a new abdominal aortic aneurysm ("AAA") screening benefit and announce the respective updates for the PFS and HOPD payment rates. Following is a synopsis of the qualitative analysis of the rules that may be of primary importance to SVU members. Additionally included is an excel spreadsheet with a quantitative, code-by-code impact analysis. PFS Final RuleMost importantly from an ultrasound perspective, the PFS rule implements the imaging payment caps and the AAA benefit found in the Deficit Reduction Act ("DRA"). Imaging Provisions of the Deficit Reduction ActAs required by section 5102(b)(1) of the DRA, CMS will cap the technical component of the PFS payment amount for the 2007 year (prior to geographic adjustment) by the 2007 HOPD payment amount (prior to geographic adjustment). CMS will then apply the PFS geographic adjustment to the capped payment amount. In determining the Current Procedural Terminology ("CPT") and alpha-numeric Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System ("HCPCS") codes that fall within the scope of "imaging services" defined by the DRA provision, CMS states that "imaging services provide visual information regarding areas of the body that are not normally visible, thereby assisting in the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury." CMS considered the CPT 7XXXX series codes for radiology services and then added in oth er CPT codes and alpha-numeric HCPCS codes that describe imaging services. Then the agency excluded the following services:
We estimate the overall DRA effect on ultrasound in the physician setting at $234 million, with approximately $159 million from vascular ultrasound codes and approximately $75 million for echocardiography color flow. CMS Excludes Certain Ultrasound CodesA variety of public comments requested that CMS exclude specific codes from the implementation of the DRA imaging provisions. Those requests were largely denied by CMS, citing the definition for imaging found in the DRA. However, CMS did agree with one of our arguments that five specific ultrasound codes should be excluded on the basis they provide no image, resulting in an estimated $23,000,000 in restored payments. See the table below, with information from estimates taken from the Lewin Report:
Multiple Imaging Payment Reduction & Interaction with DRA CutsPlease note that this does not at this point in time, the multiple imaging payment reduction DOES NOT affect any noninvasive vascular codes. As discussed in the PFS proposed rule, CMS will maintain a 25 percent reduction for multiple imaging procedures and will forgo the planned progression to a 50 percent reduction, in light of the DRA cuts to imaging. Noting that it continues to study this issue, CMS has decided to calculate payments by applying the multiple procedure reduction prior to the application of the HOPD cap in acknowledgement of arguments that the HOPD schedule may at least implicitly already include a reduction for multiple imaging procedures. Non-obstetrical ultrasound procedures involving the chest, abdomen and pelvis (codes 76604, 76700, 76705, 76770, 76775, 76778, 76831, 76856 and 76857) are covered by the multiple payment reduction. An illustration of the multiple procedure reduction is below, as represented in the PFS rule:
AAA Screening BenefitThe PFS rule implements the AAA benefit found in the DRA. Unfortunately, consistent with the statute, CMS did not include quality standards for providers of the benefit. The PFS rule establishes a definition for "eligible beneficiary," with three primary criteria for eligibility:
Payment for the AAA screening benefit will commence through a new payment code (G0389) that will be reimbursed at the same rate as CPT code 76775 ( Ultrasound, retroperitoneal ( e.g. , renal aorta modes), B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; limited) , which contains 1.50 RVUs. With a 2007 conversion factor (including the negative physician update) of 35.9848, the PFS payment for G0389 is expected to be $79.17, which is generally perceived as being reasonable. This service would be subject to the DRA imaging rule however as the HOPD APC payment for this service would be $95.93, the PFS payment will apply to Part B providers. The AAA benefit will be added to the list of services for which the beneficiary deductible does not apply. Conversion Factor IssuesCMS released its PFS rule with a substantial increase in the work component for the relative value units ("RVUs") for face-to-face visits (known as evaluation and management or "E&M services.") Reflecting that change, the intermediate office visit-the most frequently billed service-will see an increase of 37 percent for the work component for the associated RVUs. Similarly, the work components for RVUs associated with two other most frequently billed services-office visit requiring moderately complex decision-making and hospital visit requiring moderately complex decision-making-will increase by 29 percent and 31 percent, respectively. To make that change approximately budget neutral, as required by law, CMS will apply a 10.1 percent reduction to all work RVUs to offset the increases outlined above. Given that the technical component of ultrasound procedures does not contain any work RVUs, sonographers will not be directly affected by this approach. We had asked CMS not to include technical component services in undertaking the budget methodology adjustment for the E&M work RVU changes. Additionally, CMS, as required by statute, has calculated a physician update of -5.0 percent, which is slightly more favorable than in the proposed rule. It initially estimated a physician update of -5.1 percent. In past years, Congress has intervened to prevent a negative physician update. Some will advocate doing so again this year, although the chances of action are uncertain during the post-election, lame duck session beginning next week. New Standards for IDTFsThe Office of Inspector General for HHS reviewed CMS payments to IDTFs from 2003 to 2004 and discovered about $71,000,000 in improper payments, reportedly because of poor or missing documentation or lack of medical necessity. Other data indicates that, particularly in California, the number of IDTFs is increasing substantially faster than the growth in the Medicare population, yet the utilization rate at other sites of service remains constant. Accordingly, CMS has issued new standards with which IDTFs must comply or face revocation of billing privileges. IDTFs must comply with each of these 11 standards by January 1, 2007:
CMS states that if, at any time, an IDTF fails to meet any of the above standards, its billing privileges will be revoked. Additionally, multi-state entities must maintain documentation that its supervising physician and technicians are licensed and certified in each applicable state. CMS has established that an IDTF supervising physician, as listed in the Medicare enrollment application, may not supervise more than three IDTF sites. In addition to establishing specific performance standards for IDTFs, CMS defines the "point of the actual delivery of service" as the correct "place of service" on the claim form. Accordingly, the IDTF would bill the designated Medicare carrier for the applicable place of service, as opposed to the home location of the IDTF. However, when a diagnostic test contains a home-based and facility-based element ( e.g . interpretation), the IDTF's fixed location of service would be listed as the "place of service." HOPD Final RuleOn the same day it issued the PFS rule, CMS released the final version of its rule for Medicare payment for hospital outpatient services ("HOPD rule"). CMS expects that the rule will result in payments of an estimated $32.5 billion to hospitals, which reflects a 3.4 percent update (or a 3.0 percent increase in payments when other factors are included.) Assignment of Payment Code and Rate for the AAA BenefitThe HOPD rule implements for hospitals the AAA provision of the DRA discussed more fully in the PFS rule and specifically establishes a new code for that procedure. Recognizing the provisions of the DRA relating to the AAA screening benefit, CMS will limit reimbursements to individuals exhibiting certain characteristics, as illustrated above. As outlined in the PFS rule, Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm will be included in the initial preventive physical examination and will be added to the list of services for which the beneficiary deductible does not apply. Consistent with the PFS rule, CMS assigned HCPCS code G0389 (Ultrasound, B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening) to be reported on or after January 1, 2007, to describe an ultrasound screening test for AAA. Payment for G0389 will be made at the same level as CPT code 76775 (Ultrasound, retroperitoneal ( e.g ., renal aorta modes), B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; limited), which is assigned to APC 0266 (Level II Diagnostic and Screening Ultrasound). The payment rate for APC 0266 is $95.93 for CY 2007. DC1 891698v.4 November 16, 2006 01:52 PM |
Supplementary InformationDownload this file (requires MS Excel) to help determine your 2007 payment rate (see clarification below*):
Read the complete CMS Press Release *Important Clarification*It is very important to understand that the 2007 APC payments listed in the Code-by-Code Charts are national averages and are not to be used to determine what you will be paid. The APC amount will be adjusted by your local geographic modifier and will be published by your local Medicare carrier. Please consult you local carriers' website to determine what your actual reimbursement will be for 2007.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © Society for Vascular Ultrasound |
4601 Presidents Drive, Suite 260, Lanham, MD 20706-4831 |